:: Volume 14, Issue 2 (spring & summer 2019) ::
ijpd 2019, 14(2): 21-32 Back to browse issues page
Attitude of Kerman dental students towards electronic learning and related factors
M Karimiafshar Dr, M Karimigooghari Dr, M TorabiParizi21 Dr
Associate professor Pathology department, Dental school, Kerman Medical Sciences University, Kerman, Iran
Abstract:   (195 Views)
Background:In recent years information, communication technology  and electronic learning  have been gain a big role in higher educational level.The aim of the present study was to assessment of Kerman dental students attitude about electronic learning.
Materials and methods:This cross-sectional study was carried on 307 dental students, who selected through census sampling method. Data were collected through demographic data,experience of e-learning  and  questionnaire consist of 15 question about attitude to electronic learning. Data analyzed in SPSS 21 soft-ware using T,ANOVA and linear regression tests. P-value considered at 0.05 significant level.
Results:In the present study 57.0% were girls90.2% were familiar with computer more than 3 past years. 70.4% used computer over 3 hours in week. The most score was in using web explorer.Sixty nine  and four percent had positive attitude. There was not significant correlation between academic year, sex and attitude. There was significant correlation between familiar with computer, using internet, dental school hard ware quality  and attitude
Conclusion:Based on the results of the present study about two third of students had positive attitude about electronic learning. Students’ experience about using web exploring was good. There was significant correlation between dental school hard ware quality  and attitude .
 
Keywords: Electronic learning, web, computer, attitude, dental, students
Full-Text [PDF 988 kb]   (45 Downloads)    
Type of Article: Research | Subject: General
Received: 2019/07/22 | Accepted: 2019/07/22 | Published: 2019/07/22
References
1. Fincham AG, Shuler CF. The changing face of dental education: the impact of J Dent Educ 2001;65:406-21.
2. Stromso HI, Grottum P, Hofgaard Lycke K. Changes in student approaches to learning with the introduction of computer-supported problem-based learning. Med Educ2004;38:390-8. [DOI:10.1046/j.1365-2923.2004.01786.x] [PMID]
3. 3 .Komerik N.Use of the Internet among dental students in Turkey. J Dent Educ. 2005 Apr;69(4):470-5.
4. Al-Jewair TS1, Qutub AF, Malkhassian G, Dempster LJ. A systematic review of computer-assisted learning in endodontics education. J Dent Educ. 2010 Jun;74(6):601-11.
5. 5 .Grigg P, Stephens CD. Review: computer-assisted learning in dentistry-a view from the UK. J Dent 1998; 26(387):95. [DOI:10.1016/S0300-5712(98)00012-8]
6. 6 .Morrow JA, Pulido MT, Smith PB, McDaniel TF, Willcox AB. Effective use of e-grading in the dental simulation clinic. J Dent Educ. 2014 Jun;78(6):829-37.
7. 7 .Gupta B, White DA, Walmsley AD. The attitudes of undergraduate students and staff to the use of electronic learning Br Dent J. 2004 Apr 24;196(8):487-92. [DOI:10.1038/sj.bdj.4811179] [PMID]
8. 8 .Fayaz A, Mazahery A, Hosseinzadeh M, Yazdanpanah S.Video-based Learning Versus Traditional Method for Preclinical Course of Complete Denture Fabrication. J Dent (Shiraz). 2015 Mar;16(1 Suppl):21-8.
9. 9 .Ariana A, Amin M, Pakneshan S, Dolan-Evans E, Lam AK. Integration of Traditional and E-Learning Methods to Improve Learning Outcomes for Dental Students in Histopathology. J Dent Educ. 2016 Sep;80(9):1140-8.
10. 10 .Sadeghi R, Sedaghat MM, Sha Ahmadi F. Comparison of the effect of lecture and blended teaching methods on students' learning and satisfaction. J Adv Med Educ Prof. 2014 Oct;2(4):146-50.
11. 11 .Brumini G, Spalj S, Mavrinac M, Biočina-Lukenda D, Strujić M, Brumini M. Attitudes towards e-learning amongst dental students at the universities in Croatia. Eur J Dent Educ. 2014 Feb;18(1):15-23. [DOI:10.1111/eje.12068] [PMID]
12. Adewole-Odeshi E. Attitude of Students Towards E-learning in South- West Nigerian Universities: An Application of Technology Acceptance Model. Libr Philos Pract [Internet]. 2014;19.
13. 13 .Mirzaei M, Ahmadipour F, Azizian F. View points of students of Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences towards e-Learning in teaching clinical biochemistry. Jmed . 2012; 7(2): 67-74[Persian]
14. 14 .Seyde Naghavi M A. Study of Teachers and Students Attitude toward E-learning:Surveying in Iran's E-learning Universities IRPHE 2007, 13(1): 157-176[Persian]
15. Jafari, Navimipour N, Zareie B . A model for assessing the impact of e-learning systems on employees' satisfaction. Computers in Human Behavior 2015; 53: 475-485. [DOI:10.1016/j.chb.2015.07.026]
16. Decˇman M. Modeling the acceptance of e-learning in mandatory environments of higher education: The influence of previous education and gender. Computers in Human Behavior2015; 49 : 272-281. [DOI:10.1016/j.chb.2015.03.022]
17. 17 .Pakseresht S , Khalili-Sabet M , Vahedi MA , Monfared A. comparative study for Knowledge and Attitudes of Virtual and Non Virtual Students towards E-Learning. Resarch in Medical Education.2017;8(4):61 68.[Persian] [DOI:10.18869/acadpub.rme.8.4.61]
18. Latifnejad Roudsari R, Jafari H, Hosseini BL, Esfalani A. Measuring students' knowledge and attitude towards E- learning in Mashhad University of Medical Sciences (MUMS).Iranian Journal of Medical Education 2011;10(4):364-373. [Persian]
19. 19 .Keshavarz M, Rahimi M, Esmaeili Z. The Effect of e-Learning on the Academic Development of University Students. Journal of Torbat Heydariyeh University of Medical Sciences. 2013; 1 (2) :13-21[Persian]
20. Rhema, A, Miliszewska I. Analysis of student attitudes towards e-learning: The case of engineering students in Libya. Issues in Informing Science and Information Technology 2014;11: 169-190. [DOI:10.28945/1987]
21. Hussain I. A study of student's attitude towards virtual education in Pakistan. Turkish Journal of Distance Learning 2007; 8(2), 69-79.
22. 22 .Okhovati M, Sharifpoor Ghahestani E, Islami Nejad T, Hamzezadeh Marzooni M, Motamed Jahroomi M. Attitude, Knowledge and Skill of Medical Students Toward E-Learning Kerman University Of Medical Sciences. Educ Strategy Med Sci. 2015; 8(1) :51-58[Persian]
23. 23 .Sebnmen. Investigation of Students' Attitudes towards e-learning in terms of different variables. Journal of Educational Research and Reviews2015 ;10(1): 81-91. [DOI:10.5897/ERR2014.1980]
24. Dhiman K , Birbal S , Bhim C M. Attitude of University Students towards E-learning in West Bengal. American Journal of Educational Research.2014; 2(8), 669-673. [DOI:10.12691/education-2-8-16]
25. Cheng K. A research study on students' level of acceptance in applying e-learning for business course: A case study on a Technical College in Taiwan. Journal of American Academy of Business.2006; 8(2), 265-272.
26. Zabadi A M , Al-Alawi AH. University Students' Attitudes towards E-Learning: University of Business & Technology (UBT)-Saudi Arabia-Jeddah: A Case Study. International Journal of Business and Management.2016;11(6):286-295. [DOI:10.5539/ijbm.v11n6p286]
27. Mohammadi SD, Hosseini SM, Shaban Ali Fami H, Rajab Beigi M, Eisaei MT. An analysis of the attitudes of instructors towards E-Learning in agricultural Applied-Science education in Iran. Iran J Agric Econ Dev Res. 2008;39(1):99-109. [Persian]



XML   Persian Abstract   Print



Volume 14, Issue 2 (spring & summer 2019) Back to browse issues page